Structured document formatting review

Document formatcompliance checkerfor cleaner reviews.

Upload `.docx` files, compare layout and formatting against reusable template rules, and review issues with a faster, clearer workflow.

Formatria mark

Quick upload

Guest document check

Guest users can continue without signing in.

Documents analyzed

148

Across active templates and repeated submissions.

Average compliance

91.4%

Based on the latest completed runs this month.

Official templates

12

Curated rulesets for standardized document checks.

How it works

Designed for a straightforward compliance loop

Formatria keeps the first visit light, then reveals templates, guest rule choices, results, profile controls, and admin management only after the user moves forward from the initial upload step or enters the authenticated workspace.

Step 1

Upload a `.docx` file

Step 2

Choose guest rules or sign in for saved templates

Step 3

Run document analysis

Step 4

Review score, issues, and next actions

Guest history

Recent checks on this browser

These items stay local to this device. They help guests reopen recent analysis results without mixing them into workspace history.

Loading local guest history

Checking this browser for recent guest analysis results.

Format coverage

Built for `.docx` today, structured for broader rules later

The rule engine stays focused on the essentials while preserving enough structure for future templates, roles, and asynchronous processing.

Official Submission Format

Official

Balanced ruleset for formal long-form documents with strict margin and spacing checks.

14 active rules

Formal Report Standard

Official

Useful for organization reports and documentation with a lighter heading structure.

10 active rules

My Compliance Baseline

Private

Private starter template for repeated internal review before final submission.

8 active rules

Results that stay readable

Score, issues, and report entry points in one consistent view

The result flow is designed to support clear decision making: what broke, where it happened, and what the template expected.

Example summary

92%

Warning

Left margin differs from the selected template.

Line spacing is tighter than expected.

One paragraph uses a different alignment.